The Vaccine Race
[Disclaimer: We are not medical doctors. Nothing in this article constitutes medical advise. This article is intended for entertainment purposes only. If you are experiencing health issues please contact your qualified medical provider.]
We are going to take you on a journey. Some of what we propose will seem reasonable, some of it outlandish, even wildly improbable. In this article we are going to show you why we think the vaccine race has been part of a protracted global conflict, how old school vaccines may work in the framework of arsenic toxicity, and how recent developments may have refined the same principles of vaccine science to yield the mRNA vaccines.
ODD!
When the MHRA adverse effects lists were first published on the UK government website, there was something peculiar about the data set points. At the top of each vaccine summary was ‘earliest reaction date’. The report from February 15, 2021, showed a first reaction date for Astra Zeneca as January 5, 2020, nearly a week before the Covid-19 viral genome was released by the Chinese authorities (11-12 January).
The Pfizer report was even more baffling, showing an ‘earliest reaction date’ of January 19, 2001, a full 19 years before Covid-19 supposedly appeared on the scene. Was the Chinese sequencing a ‘virology’ formality, where the whole pharmaceutical world already knew what they were dealing with. If so how long had they known?
For the avoidance of doubt, we checked the reports again recently for this series of Vaccine articles. The Astra Zeneca earliest reaction date of the report run in November 2022 was now February 3, 1921 and the Pfizer ‘earliest reaction date’ was April 13, 1968. Even more puzzling.
A swift step back in time
Astra Zeneca, previously Astra AB, was a Swedish chemicals and pharmaceutical company formed in 1913. Digitotal, a heart medicine and Glukofos, a nutrient supplement were launched in 1914. Post World War I Astra came under socialist government ownership. In 1925 a consortium bought the company back in to private ownership. Looking at vaccine milestones on the UK government website, the first ‘viral’ vaccine was apparently created by Pasteur in 1885 against rabies, so it is certainly feasible some sort of ‘viral’ vaccine was produced by Astra AB in 1921. Could they have been producing vaccines under post war orders from the Swedish socialist government? Sidenote: Seb is certain it was Jenner who created the first rabies vaccine and that actually Smallpox vaccines trumped them both.
Pfizer, founded in the USA in 1849, provided battle field medicine for the American Civil War and industrial chemicals for broader use. They were forerunners in the fermentation tank production of penicillin and citric acid. By the 1960’s they had brought a wide range of drugs to market, including the broad spectrum antibiotic Vibramycin, a tetracyclin class antibiotic with chelating properties. The searchable history of Pfizer vaccines is oddly sparse. In 1963 they produced a measles vaccine, which was used by the authority of the CDC to stamp out measles in the USA by 1966.
Albert Sabin, the inventor of the oral attenuated (weakened) live polio vaccine, was born in Poland when it was part of the Russian Empire and emigrated to the USA in 1921 with his Polish-Jewish parents. Sabin entered in to agreement with Pfizer in the 1950’s to produce his new oral polio vaccine which stimulated antibody production in the gut (the site of polio infection) but did not cause paralysis. He apparently gave them rights to the strains and the company produced them in the Pfizer British based labs in Folkestone and Sandwich, Kent. Sabin was also working with Russian scientist Mikhail Chumakov of Moscow State University, who collaborated in a large scale polio vaccination study of 100 million people in the USSR, Mexico, The Netherlands, Singapore and Eastern Europe from 1955 to 1961. It is unclear if Pfizer entered in to agreement during or after this test phase, or whether negotiations with a scientist who worked extensively with a Russian counterpart was an issue in those negotiations.
Today BioNTech, the inventors of specialist lipid nanotechnology to encapsulate Pfizer’s Covid-19 mRNA vaccine, has its headquarters in the German town of Marburg. CSL Behring, the company who invented the 1918 flu virus vaccine is also headquartered there. It was at the Hoescht laboratories (now part of CSL Behring), that grivet monkeys arrived from Uganda in 1967, via stop over in London (three different lengths of stop over) because of the Six Day War. Whilst the monkeys showed no sign of illness during their stay in London, multiple monkeys died during their quarantine periods across all three labs. Shortly after the shipments arrived in Marburg, Frankfurt and Belgrade, the so-called ‘Marburg’ haemorrhagic virus broke out. The monkeys were being used to research a new poliomyelitus vaccine.
In 1968 an epidemic of polio broke out in Poland, the polio vaccine being the primary suspect. Except in this paper, studies in both Moscow and Switzerland found no adverse reactions post vaccination. Were Germany and Poland, two neighbouring countries, and to a lesser extent Yugoslavia, experiencing some sort of attack unrelated or even related to the work on the polio vaccine?
It seems even less coincidental that in 1968, a new ‘flu pandemic’ broke out first in China, called Hong Kong flu, which rapidly spread around the world, killing between one and four million people. The work by the ‘Marburg’ laboratories, Russia and Pfizer in the UK, appear to show work to mitigate polio outbreaks, yet are followed swiftly by a pandemic of flu that had all the hallmarks of Covid-19. Was polio downgraded to flu somehow by the vaccines? It seems the Cold War, tensions in the Middle East, punctuated by the Six Day War (June, 1967), and threatening outbreaks in Europe were linked somehow with the development of this vaccine.
 | A guest post by
|