Let's get to the nitty gritty. 'The' photo, issued on Mother's day, March 10th 2024, is literally flooding over with coding. It references two timelines, one from the 1700's, the other from today. To understand today we must know what was going on in the 1700's.
Layers of coding
The photo is Figurative – The three children and mother are acting the parts of historical figures and modern day nations.
The photo is also Allegorical – The positioning of, and relationship between the figures, expose a deeply hidden historical plot and its modern day equivalent.
Missing characters – The absence of a key character (the artistic director/photographer) is significant and symbolic. This character, and the country they represent, has stayed in the shadows, carrying out the plot AWAY from the public eye for 300 years.
Fingers and hands - How do we know there is coding in positioning of hands and fingers? Because the KILL notice to withdraw the photo by the six press agencies, used 'digital manipulation' as the reason for withdrawing it
In LATIN a finger is a 'digitus' and hand is 'manus'. By highlighting 'Digit'al 'Mani'pulation we are being told to look carefully at the hands.
Press Agencies
The Press Agencies were EITHER in on the photo submission and KILL notice, or were forced to withdraw it due to the clear coded messages it contains – most of the agencies involved were developed before both world wars, and had their historical roots in enemy states, or were in some way allied to enemy states.
Confirmation
How do we know that these four historical figures are the ones being referred to in the photo?
Because three distinct markers appeared on the morning of 10th March.
The first was the altered search engine snippet of the Frederick the Great Wikipedia entry. We regularly look up his profile for date references but had not seen this alteration until 10th March. As the four historical figures alluded to in the photo are directly connected with Frederick the Great, this was used as first confirmation of relevance.
The second was the increase in heatspots on Zoom.earth underneath two specific areas. One was Kaliningrad, the original Konigsberg of Prussia where all Prussian Kings were crowned, the other Ukraine (see below). Both of these areas are directly connected historically and in modern day to the lead figure in the photo.
The third confirmation is through analysing the roles of the characters in the photo itself, which will be explained below.
Very Brief Background
There was great unrest in Europe that had started in the 1500's with the introduction of the Protestant religion, Lutheranism. Sweden led war-based (forced) conversion of large swathes of Northern Europe. The key aim was to separate the people from the Catholic Church and Catholic Monarchs, weakening the Holy Roman Empire and France specifically.
The movement of 'Protestantism' was more political than it was religious. Every tool in the book was used to encourage people to abandon Catholicism, including establishing financial control and using it to manipulate markets, interfering with lines of succession in Monarchies, waging strategic wars, engineering the vote in favour of, or against, a certain pope – installing popes that would give the Church a bad name and introducing a SECOND religious movement that would drive a wedge even further between the Monarchs and their people. Oh and engineering the Plague.
The Monarchs largely converted NOT to lutheranism but to Calvinism, which was a sort of religious halfway house. One foot in Catholicism, whilst still attempting to reform. This is why Calvinism was associated with the Reformation, rather than Protestantism.
We suspect Calvinism was set up by the Jesuits, but we don't think the Jesuits were actually working for the true Catholic Church. This is because the original members were mostly from Spain, which was under the influence of the Bavarian (southern German) Banking family called the Fuggers, who also controlled a lot of the Papal finances in Northern Europe, and were closely linked with the German Houses including Brandenburg-Prussia.
We think the Jesuits were effectively a spy network created to ensure that the Monarchs stayed in their half way house lane, making the wedge between them and the people even wider, destabilising all Catholic nations, and even slightly insecure, fledgling Protestant nations such as Britain. More on this in previous articles.
Watch the ring finger
Traditionally different states of Europe prefer their wedding ring on different hands. Four key states favour wearing the wedding ring on the right: Russia, Germany, Poland and Ukraine. Other states using the right hand include Denmark, Norway, Belgium and south eastern Balkans.
Those who traditionally wear wedding rings on the left are the UK, France, Italy and some nordic countries including Sweden and Iceland, north western Balkans and some of central Europe.
Spain and the Netherlands switch between either hand.
Attention has been drawn to ring fingers in this photo to explain historical and modern allegiances.
Four Historical Characters
The figures, poses and details:
Catherine plays Catherine the Great of Russia (Catherine II) – She is seated or throned. Note the seat has arms, symbolic of a throne and of the Empress holding court. She has no wedding ring on her left hand as she is widowed. Catherine is not Russian. She is an imposter and really Prussian.
George plays George III of Britain – He is standing directly behind Catherine with his arms loosely around her neck. He does not have a strong hold on her, but he is aware that she needs to be contained. George is laughing freely and standing in the centre top of the group, indicating that he, as George III, or as Britain in the current war against Russia (Prussia), has a good overview of the real situation and is in relative control.
His right hand is holding on to his left ring finger as if it is held captive. This is a reference to being held captive, and being controlled, by his wife Queen Charlotte. In addition his smile seems slightly over the top, as if he is having a crazed outburst of laughter, referencing the reported mental state of King George III.
Charlotte plays Queen Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz, the wife of George III of Britain - She stands to the left of Catherine who holds her firmly by the waist. This is symbolic of a close relationship between the Empress Catherine and Queen Charlotte. Charlotte is sitting on the arm of the throne, which indicates being relaxed and familiar in the presence of the Empress.
The absence of ring on the hand holding Charlotte is also symbolic of blood ties rather than ties of marriage (Augustus II, Duke of Brunswick (1579-1666) was married to an Anhalt-Zerbst which is Catherine's blood line, and later a Mecklenburg, which is Queen Charlotte's bloodline. Both women produced heirs).
Charlotte is holding her right hand in her left, crossing over and covering the right hand and ring finger, again a reference to marriage and loyalties. She is not covering her left hand or left ring finger, indicating there no true allegiance to her husband George III. She is boldly covering her right hand and ring finger, suggesting a secure and secret allegiance to Catherine the Great.
Louis plays Louis XVI of France. He is holding on to Catherine the Great's throne to stabilise himself with the left hand, symbolising a wobbly relationship with Britain (left hand), and a need for support from Catherine II. With the right hand he has formed a peculiar cross over his right wedding finger, rather than with the index over middle finger as we would expect to see. This is a strong reference to covering up allegiance to Catherine the Great (right wedding finger) very possibly through his wife Marie Antoinette. The crossing, as many have pointed out, may mean he is being caught in a lie, and is hoping for the best.
Characters confirmed
Let’s look at when each of these figures comes in to power or marries in to power. They are all very close together, another confirmation we are looking in the right place.
George III is crowned in 1760, Queen Charlotte marries him on 8th September 1761, Catherine the Great is crowned Empress on 9th July 1762.
The exception is Louis XVI who is made Dauphin of France at the age of 11 on the death of his father, 20th December 1765, as he is too young to take the throne.
This is important. France is the weak link. This also explains Louis crossing his fingers and using Catherine's throne as a stabiliser. This highlights the infantilism of the head of France, and his reliance on an older female figure to guide him.
Catherine the Great was born in 1729, George III in 1738, Queen Charlotte in 1744 and King Louis in 1754. This is the same order of birth as their name sakes in the photo. This is the third formal confirmation.
This makes Catherine the Great the political head of the group – Age before Beauty.
Both Queen Charlotte and King Louis are being nurtured by her, where George III has seen what is going on and is on the attack, as much as he is able.
The Artistic Director/Photographer
Frederick II of Prussia (born 1712) does not appear figuratively in this photo but he is referred to in this snippet below, discovered online the same day the photograph is released by Kensington Palace - 10th March 2024. This is the first time we have seen mention of the words 'ol peen gobbler'. Historical records suggest that Frederick was gay.
The snippet is guiding us to a relationship with Gustav III, who became King of Sweden in 1771, on the death of his father Adolf Frederick. Adolf Frederick was Catherine the Great's Uncle. He was actually German, of the leading House Holstein-Gottorp and his son also. The family had taken the Kingship of Sweden when George III's godfather died as there was no heir to the throne.
The snippet implies that there was some level of control by the German King of Sweden up until 1771 over Frederick the Great. We think this is a DISTRACTION, and an attempt to deflect attention away from Frederick, as this family was German and will have been influenced by Prussia in a similar way to other German principalities.
Frederick took steps to secure the allegiance of Catherine well before 1772 and was very much in control of their relationship.
What the snippet does confirm however, is that there is a strong collaborative triangle between Catherine the Great, Frederick the Great and Gustav III of Sweden.
Frederick the Great's hidden influence on Catherine the Great is symbolised by Catherine's lack of ring, visible to the photographer (Frederick). She is showing Frederick that her allegiance to him is far stronger than her allegiance is by marriage to Russia.
The Timeline
Catherine is the daughter of an impoverished Prince from Prussia and titled Princess Sophia Augusta Frederica von Anhalt-Zerbst (born 1729). Her father, like most noble males in Prussia, is an officer in the formidable Prussian Army under Frederick the Great.
Empress Elizabeth had reportedly killed off her predecessor to come to the throne in 1741, just one year after Frederick William I of Prussia died and passed Prussia to his son Frederick II.
Elizabeth is openly anti-Prussian.
In 1745 Catherine marries Peter of Russia, the son of Empress Elizabeth, and continues regular correspondence with Frederick the Great.
In Catherine the Great, by Anne Carter, 1968 p.23 there is a passage about Catherine visiting Frederick II with her parents before she becomes Empress: 'Frederick II had every intention of getting the Princess to act as a secret agent for Prussia, and as a loyal vassal, she saw nothing wrong in this'.
George III is crowned King of Britain in 1760.
In 1761, towards the end of the 7 years war in Europe, the Empress Elizabeth 'dies suddenly' with hallmarks of poisoning. Catherine's husband Peter becomes Emperor Peter III.
In the same year 1761 Princess Charlotte of Mecklenburg-Strelitz marries George III, and becomes Queen Charlotte.
This match between Charlotte and George is considered to be a 'safe' one as the principality of Mecklenburg-Strelitz is not of great importance. This safe status is spelled out in a letter that somehow finds its way in to the hands of George III whilst everyone is trying unsuccessfully to find him a wife. The letter is reportedly written by Princess Charlotte to Frederick the Great of Prussia towards the end of the the Seven Years War.
Source: Memoir of Her Majesty Sophia Charlotte, of Macklenburg Strelitz, Queen of Great Britain, 1818, p 12.
'MAY IT PLEASE YOUR MAJESTY
(a) “I am at a loss whether I should congratulate or condole with you on your late victory; since the same success which has covered you with laurels; has overspread the country of Mecklenburg with desolation. I know, Sire, that it seems unbecoming in my sex, in this age of vicious refinement, to feel for one's country, to lament the horrors of war, or to wish for the return of peace. I know you may think it more properly my province to study the arts of pleasing, or to inspect subjects of a more domestic nature; but however unbecoming it may be in me, I cannot resist the desire of interceding for this unhappy people.
It was but a very few years ago that this territory wore the most pleasing appearance. The country was cultivated, the peasant looked cheerful, and the towns abounded with riches and festivity. What an alteration at present from such a charming scene! I am not expert at describing, nor can my fancy add any horrors to the picture; but sure even conquerors themselves would weep at the picture now before me. The whole country, my dear country, lies before me one frightful waste, presenting objects only to excite terror, pity and despair. The business of the husbandman and the shepherd are quite discontinued; the husbandman and the shepherd are become soldiers themselves, and assist to ravage the soil they formerly cultivated. The towns are inhabited only by old men, women, and children, with, perhaps, here and there a wounded or dismembered warrior left, as useless, at his door. See how his little children come round him, ask the history of every wound, and grown almost soldiers themselves before they have strength for the trial, or before they have judgement to calculate the distresses that war brings on mankind. But this, even this, might be borne, did we not feel the alternate insolence of either army, as it happens to advance or retreat, in pursuing the objects of the campaign: it is impossible to express the confusion, which those, who even call themselves our friends, create; and those, from whom we might expect redress, oppress us with new calamities. From your justice, Sire, it is therefore that we hope for relief; to you even women and children may complain, whose humanity stoops to the meanest petition and whose power is capable of repressing the greatest injustice.
“I am,
“Sire,” &c'
Mecklenburg as a state seems to be devastated and very weak. Frederick is the only person Charlotte can go to in desperate need of help, and with charitable concerne for her people, even though she is going around her father to write this letter, which is unusual for the time. She also seems to be strongly pacifist and against war, which would endear her to a foreign match. The letter strikes the perfect pitch and seems almost to have been written with George in mind. Of course George III cannot not resist the challenge of ‘rescuing’ her and falls for her.
Which is, as we will see, not such a bright idea.
In 1762 Peter III miraculously signs a peace with Frederick II of Prussia ending the war between Prussia and Russia, no doubt with the encouragement of his Prussian wife.
Peter reigns for just SIX months before Catherine deposes him, forces him in to exile, where he is killed by one of her many military lovers. This could be referenced in the 'KILL' notice by SIX press agencies.
Catherine takes Peter's place. She has carried out a Coup d'Etat.
The European Chess Board
Britain sees exactly what was going on. In conference with George III, The Earl of Bute then withdraws military funding from Prussia, who they had supported through the Seven Years War. This is likely in response to the sudden and suspicious death of the Empress Elizabeth, followed by the miraculous peace between Prussia and Russia, then the deposing and killing of Peter III, and the ascension of Catherine, who was in close contact with Frederick with Great of Prussia, and Prussian herself.
Britain then allies with France, Portugal and Spain, and attempts to bring Austria on side but fails. The Treaty of Paris, is signed on the 10th February 1763 and gives significant protection for Catholics and Catholicism, allowing catholicism to be practised in Canada, being inhabited by approximately 70,000 French by 1763. This move greatly annoys the largely Protestant Americans, from whom it seemed the French are being protected. The Peace Treaty also restores lands to Prussia and Hanover.
Prussia allies with Austria and Saxony through the Treaty of Hubertusburg just five days later.
Catherine then allies with Prussia, Poland and Sweden in the Northern Accord (Sweden being run by one of the German noble families) to counter the Bourbon and Haspburg powers of The Holy Roman Empire and France, effectively splitting Europe in two.
In 1765, just two years after the Treaties and the Northern Accord, Prussia still smarting from the withdrawal of funding and alliance with Britain, George III of Britain has the first of a series of episodes of 'mental illness' which become known as 'the madness of King George'.
Through her negotiations with Parliament around the Regency Bill of 1765, and provision for her ascension to power if King George III was permanently incapacitated, it seems Queen Charlotte is VERY keen on getting her hands on the throne. From some texts, including the correspondence of George, the Prince Regent Charlotte, it appears the bill did not pass.
Thankfully King George III recovers fairly swiftly from his first bout of illness.
In 1770 the Dauphin Louis of France marries Marie Antoinette of Austria, who corresponds frequently with Queen Charlotte. Remember that Austria refused to ally with Britain in 1763 and instead aligned with Prussia.
In 1772 Louis XVI finally becomes King of France.
In 1779, despite their alliance as laid out in the Treaty of Paris, France attempts to launch an invasion against Britain whilst Britain is right in the middle of the American War of Independence.
It was as if Louis XVI wanted to prove himself as a King, having spent a considerable amount of time unable to operate as such whilst events went on around him. He sought to humiliate Britain by securing their defeat in America and reclaim all other territories including Dunkirk, the strangest previous agreement for which was detailed in the 1763 Treaty of Paris here.
In 1783 Catherine the Great annexes the Crimean Khanate (Ukraine) and together with Frederick the Great whilst colonising this and the rest of Ukraine with Prussian, German and Russian emigrants, who are paid to move there.
The 'Madness' of King George
In 1788 King George III suffers another bout of illness. The illness is punctuated by insomnia, 'stitches in his chest' (pain) , fever, delirium, cold and 'spasm' of the stomach (stomach upset), fretfulness (anxiety), and even jaundice.
At this point we are fairly convinced that instead of 'madness', George III is actually being poisoned. But by who?
He is sent to Kew to recuperate separately from his wife and children, away from government at a critical time for Europe, as France approaches the Revolution like an out of control juggernaut. George recovers well whilst in isolation. The visits between him and his wife are heavily restricted initially but slowly she is allowed more time with him, during which he has minor outbursts of illness.
This is when Queen Charlotte shows her true colours. With the King unwell she comes in to conflict with her son the Prince Regent over who is going to rule. The Prince Regent seems quite disgusted at the blatant canvassing for supporters, including Pitt the Younger (son of William Pitt the Elder, supporter of Frederick the Great of Prussia), to facilitate her taking power ('The correspondence of George, Prince of Wales, 1770-1812' p.4)
Thankfully Queen Charlotte does not take power.
However, she actively drives a wedge between the Prince Regent and his brother and the King. By keeping the sons separate from the King, she prevents them observing any treatment of their father, which at times is understood to be brutal, but also prevents them looking more closely at the nature of his illness. It also prevents them being able to coordinate effective leadership between them and their father - they are in limbo.
Charlotte, despite not getting her hands on power, manages to secure being guardian of the King, the Court, all properties and their children, and consults almost obsessively with Doctor Willis.
We think Queen Charlotte was poisoning King George III
The loose arms around Catherine’s neck in the photograph could be symbolic of the physical weakness of King George III, under the influence of poison. We believe the letter which somehow fell in to the hands of the King before he decided to marry her, was a clever ploy to endear her to him as an upstanding character, with the people's interests at heart. It is even possible that she didn't write the letter herself, or wrote it under instruction from Frederick the Great.
Doctor Willis (of Grantham, Lincolnshire) who arrives, unknown to most court physicians, after the first two bouts of illness, was called in by William Pitt the Younger on behalf of Queen Charlotte (the Pitts were allies of Prussia). Whilst he could not have administering the first doses of poison in 1765 and 1788, it is possible that he is paid to continue the 'treatment' whilst isolating the King, in order to remove Queen Charlotte from suspicion.
There are two Mistresses of the Wardrobe Juliane von Schwellenberg (Mecklenburg Court) and Frances Burney (chosen by Mary Granvill Delaney) who might also be under suspicion at least of helping procure poison. Schwellenberg is reported to be frequently unwell – was she clumsy in her handling of the poison or being poisoned herself? Frances Burney is in service for four years, two years either side of King George's 1788 illness, which seems very specific. Digging in to Frances Burney's past, her father was a doctor, who had visited Voltaire in Switzerland, who was a close friend of Frederick the Great. Was Burney the supplier for the 1788 poisoning?
When King George III recovers from his second bout of the course of about six months, he, quite tellingly, refuses to see the Queen, saying that when he needed her the most to shield his illness from the public eye, she had abandoned him. Instead he wished to be with Queen Esther (Lady Pembroke). Doctor Willis, a supposed specialist in 'mental illness', explains these outbursts to be part of the illness and administers more 'remedies'. It is possible that George suspects Queen Charlotte of playing a role in his illness, but any capacity to investigate this is being suppressed by treatment.
Visits with his wife resume initially with the doctor present. There is the occasional relapse to talking about Queen Esther and other supposedly mad ramblings.
In summary George III became ill just a few years in to his marriage and reign as King of Britain, then had a period between 1765 and 1788 where he was absolutely fine, then, one year before the French Revolution, he has another inexplicable relapse, worse and longer lasting than the first. His wife, Queen Charlotte is securely in the frame for a poisoning plot.
She doesn't kill him, but keeps him in a state where neither he nor his son the Prince Regent are able to rule effectively. They watch helplessly from the wings as Prussia steals the reins of America and crushes France without using an army.
What about Louis?
Frederick the Great and his predecessors align with any side in Europe as long as it is against the French.
Catherine II in turn manipulates Louis XVI through a number of people, including the Count of Vergennes (French foreign minister) and Count Louis-Phillipe Ségur, French diplomat to Russia from 1784 and from 1791 Berlin (Prussia)
In his memoires Count Ségur refers to France deferring to Catherine II 'The French monarchy descended from the first rank to make room for the Empress Catherine II, sovereign of that Muscovy heretofore almost unknown under the sway of its Czars'
Prince Nassau-Siegen, french born but in the service of Catherine the Great, attempts to broker an alliance on behalf of Louis XVI between France and Russia in 1787, just two years before the French Revolution.
In Catherine's letter to her lover Prince Grigory Potemkin (Love & Conquest : Personal correspondence of Catherine the Great and Prince Grigory Potemkin, 2004, P211), it is clear that Nassau is under Catherine's instruction, working to ensure that the French King and government continue to strive for an alliance with Russia, which then of course fails leaving France in hot water.
With this Catherine implies that Prussia (Berlin) and Denmark are the enemies of France and would pay Sweden to ally with them against France, to which Sweden would be only too happy to oblige at the right price.
In July 1787 Catherine writes to Potemkin about the Dutch civil unrest. She reports that the sister of the King of Prussia, Princess Wilhelmina, who is married to the Prince of Orange of Netherlands, has advanced, with a delegation, to the Hague to speak to Parliament on behalf of her husband, upon which she is arrested by the Pro-French Patriot Party and held for two days.
Catherine says 'We'll see how her dear old brother takes that. Louis XIV (fourteenth) would've made them beg for mercy for such a thing' implying she is watching Frederick the Great for any response, and that the young Louis XVI's response is likely to be more feeble than his grandfather’s, echoing the instability of Louis holding on to Catherine’s throne in the photo. She claims that the British are arming ships and supporting the House of Orange with money, against the Pro-French Patriot Party which then of course France has to respond to.
How much of the 'reactionism' by Britain, the Netherlands, The French Patriot Party and France is down to Catherine's and Frederick's aides seeding trouble between all of them?
In another angle of attack Marie Antoinette, wife of Louis XVI, has a Swedish lover, Count Axel von Fersen, who is leader of the Swedish anti-Royalists. It appears, from a letter of March 1788, that the Count is informing Catherine the Great of the French Monarch's affairs through Count Razumovsky. Marie Antoinette was notoriously indiscrete – loose lips sinks ships.
It is as if Catherine's light touch here and there, through Segur, Nassau, Fersen and others, is pushing and pulling Louis XVI in to war. Whilst the invasion of Britain is called off in 1779, probably to the disappointment of both Frederick and Catherine, France soon finds itself, through even more complex foreign interference, on a precipitous path to a Republic. A perfect storm which would eventually lead the complete reshaping of Europe.
The effect of the French Revolution on Europe was indelible. It 'came like death to annihilate all past and present projects, hopes, treaties, enmities, and friendships between the nations of Europe' (James Harris, 1844 p 424)
Where are we now?
Catherine was Prussian, not Russian, and continuing with our decode, it is possible that the leader of Russia today, might also not be Russian.
France in the 1700's was led by an infantile and inexperienced King, under the influence of Prussia (and an older woman), we might also consider that the same is true today. Did the current leader of France address this in his recent statement, and how reliable is that statement exactly? See article 'Macron switches from dove to hawk on Russia's invasion of Ukraine', (BBC 16.03.2024, 5am GMT)
Germany, who is represented by Charlotte, confidently sitting on the arm of the throne of Russia (Prussia), has not issued a similar statement of support in the war against Russia (Prussia) as seen in the article above. The leader of Germany is said to be aghast at the statement by the leader of France.
Is Germany NOT on our side? Is Germany, like Charlotte, keeping the enemies of Russia (Prussia) at bay, whilst George, who is Britain, sees them all for what they are, and has, up till now, defended Europe alone?
Thanks to Karen. Together we have pieced together, from a single photo and a few other snippets, what seems to be a defining moment in the history of Europe, the effects of which are still being felt.
Fascinating take on the photo and symbolic references to history. Dan Brown would be proud.